Whilst the industry has moved out of purely operating in the lab, commercially available quantum computers suffer from errors - detecting and correcting these is currently a core challenge. What is the NISQ Era?Īre we in the NISQ era? Yes, we are now in the era of NISQ which equates to quantum devices that don’t have many useful qubits and possess high error rates. Others believe the engineering challenges to overcome the NISQ era will keep the industry stuck for decades whilst the more optimistic in the industry believe that the market will emerge from the NISQ era in the next couple of years. In short, this means they are unreliable to perform general computation.Īlthough getting to this stage has taken considerable effort on the research budgets of universities and other academically focused establishments over the last few decades, we are still at a point where a quantum computer is typically no better at solving problems than classical computers.ĭue to this fundamental fallibility, some experts within the industry predict a so-called ‘quantum winter’. Noisy Intermediate Scale Quantum (NISQ) computing is a term coined by John Preskill in 2018 which noted that current quantum computers at the time (and indeed still in 2023) are prone to considerable error rates and limited in size by the number of logical qubits (or even physical qubits) in the system. It is deliberately high-level for the non-technical reader. For example, with extending the experimental platform based on the optical spatial mode from single-photon framework to two-entangled-photon framework in this work, the nonlocal error effect could be further investigated in the fault-tolerant quantum computation," the scientists say.This article provides an overview of NISQ Quantum Computing, what it means and why it matters. "Besides the error type considered in this work, other error models in a universal fault-tolerant protocol could be investigated based on this experimental platform. "We construct the setup based on the spatial modes of two photons which manifests the following advantages: (1) high-accuracy operation which is the rigid requirement of fault-tolerant circuit (2) easy to import the artificial error and adjust its rate (3) present the straight pattern of every step in the fault-tolerant process and (4) easy to implement the fault-tolerant encoded circuit and non-encoded circuit." ![]() The scientists summarize the performance of optical platform: When the success output probability of the encoded circuit is higher than that of the non-encoded circuit, we can confirm the exact value of the threshold, which is supported by the strong results including the single-qubit and two-qubit operations in the logical space.īesides facilitating the investigation of fault-tolerant quantum computation in scalable systems, this work is helpful for other quantum information tasks, such as entanglement purification and long-distance quantum communication.īy observing the error rate threshold, we could understand the detail framework of fault-tolerant protocols and judge the success of fault-tolerant. Importing the error rate artificially with an extremely high accuracy, we could scan the range of error rate which covers the threshold. With the physical qubits represented by coincident counts of the spatial modes of each photon, two logical qubits are encoded and manipulated through the corresponding operations on the physical qubits. In a new paper published in Light Science & Application, a team of scientists, led by Professor Chuan-Feng Li from CAS Key Laboratory of Quantum Information, University of Science and Technology of China, have exploited the spatial modes of two entangled photons to construct an experimental platform and have directly observed the fault-tolerant threshold for the investigated quantum circuits. And the threshold-explicit evidence to support the success of fault-tolerant method-could be determined when comparing the output probabilities of encoded circuits and non-encoded circuits. More importantly, the fault-tolerant circuit could be verified in a small system consisting of several qubits. ![]() To be more precise, based on the same hardware, logical qubits could be out put with a better probability in the fault-tolerant encoded circuit than that in the non-encoded circuit when the error rate is below the threshold. However, the fault-tolerant method, in which logical qubits are encoded with several physical qubits and the error in the physical space is allowable and is not expected to be corrected, provides another way to treat the error by excluding the qubit with errors from the encoded space.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |